Commerical LAW: Case on the dispute between an supplier of chemical product and the user who was injured during the process of these chemical product.
Date Submitted: 02/04/2004 03:48:02
Question 2.
Heidi might have claims against Acidic Pty Ltd in this matter under these possible actions.
1. Breach of contract Heidi clearly has a contract with Acidic Pty Ltd. The formation of that particular contract was on 1st July 2002, when Heidi ordered ZX10 and Acidic agrees to delivery it on 3rd July 2002.
To claim damages or seek any other remedy for breach of contract, the terms of the contact have been breached must be established. This
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
the tort of negligence, Heidi could claim all three losses he had suffered including damage to factory, profits and medical and hospital expenses. However, if Acidic can prove that Heidi himself caused parts of the damage when he washed the ampoules in the hot water. The damage and losses suffered arguably may be reduced to such extent as the curt thinks just and equitable having in mind that Heidi share some responsibility for the damage.
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.