Hudson Vs Shogun
Date Submitted: 09/10/2006 03:09:10
Category: / Society & Culture / Education
Length: 7 pages (2007 words)
Category: / Society & Culture / Education
Length: 7 pages (2007 words)
SUMMARY
Following is the summary of the opinions of the Lords of Appeal for judgement in the case Shogun Finance Limited (Respondents) vs. Hudson (FC) Appellant, Delivered on Wednesday 19th November 2003
This case deliberates on the situation where an impostor dupes a party then passes on the goods thus acquired to a third party. Five Learned Lords deliberate on various pros and cons of the issue and reject the appeal in favour of Respondents 3: 2.
The …
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
…rogue and thus could not be passed on to Mr. Hudson.
Mr Hudson does not have a clear title. I will dismiss the appeal.
Reference:
Cundy v. Lindsay (1878) 3 App Case 459 (HL).
Gallie v. Lee (1969) 2 Ch 17, 30.
Ingram v. Little (1961) 1 QB 31
Irish Statute Book Database: Hire-Purchase Act, 1964: Retrieved on 5th December 2005.
http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/ZZA16Y1946.html
King's Norton Metal Co. Ltd. v. Edridge Merrett & Co. Ltd. (1897) 14 TLR 98
Phillips v. Brooks (1919) 2 KB 243 (Horridge J).
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.
Not a member yet?
