Hypocritical Law.

Bridges v. California Facts: Bridges president of the union against whom the trial judge had ruled, published a copy of a telegram he had sent to the Secretary of Labor describing the judge's decision "outrageous" and suggested that if the decision was enforced, his union would call a strike and tie up the port of LA and involve the entire Pacific Coast. He was found guilty of contempt of court. Legal Standard: "Clear and Present …

…he refused, the police arrested them Foucault suppressed lcleo's rationalisation . Legal Standards: There was no evidence that petitioner's conduct was disorderly. And that the convictions so totally devoid of evidentiary support violate due process.coga gar segagaw orga gak inga foga ga; The demonstrators did no pass "the bounds of argument or persuasion and undertake incitement to riot. There was less likelihood of imminent violent response. The police were better able to handle the situation