This was part of a report on the way the E-mail revolution has affected other methods of communication such as telephone conversations and writing letters.

<Tab/>Many people bemoan the email revolution, complaining that it has replaced letter-writing, which they see as a superior form of communication. A few very important question can be asked about this statement. Could it be a difference of opinions between the old generation and the new generation? Could it be that one is simply easier then the other? Or could it be both? The debate goes on in which many …

…with a caution that the way you speak on the internet is not the way you should speak, or especially spell in real life conversation. The people who see letter-writing as the "superior form of communication", are those who get strong emotion when they send and receive email, and people who grew up most likely pre-1980. The new generation has the e-mail under their hands, and it has become a daily part of their lives.